Professionals tend to develop their own style based on their experience, personality, and unique needs of their company and its organizational structure.
For better training in the art of leadership, you can choose to apply for the Executive Programme in Leadership & Management offered by the Indian Institute of Management, Calcutta. The 12-month long course aims to develop strategic thinking and implementation skills among the managers. It also aims to develop leadership qualities to steer successful strategy creation and implementation.
Knowing which type of leadership style suits you best is a trait of a good leader., Seven primary leadership styles are discussed below take your pick:
Also known as the authoritarian style of leadership, this type of leader makes all decisions with little or no input from the team members. Employees are neither considered nor consulted before the implementation of decisions and are expected to adhere to them within a particular time frame and guidelines given by the team leader.
This command-and-control technique is a typical style of leadership, however, it is not considered an effective way of leadership with today’s talent. Most organizations cannot sustain such a hegemonic culture without losing employees and, therefore, opt for a more open and intellectual approach towards the team.
Democratic style of leadership is the complete opposite of autocratic leadership. Here, leaders make decisions with cooperation from every member of the team. They share necessary information with employees and seek their opinions and feedback before approving a final decision.
In today’s era, democratic leadership is considered one of the most effective ways of leadership as it allows the every employees to exercise authority and equip them with important decision-making skills they might need in the future. It provides room for creativity, development, and growth of the team members.
Similar to a sports team coach, this style of leadership views people as a reservoir of talent that needs to be developed. A leader who chooses to opt for the coach approach helps employees to unlock their hidden potential and abilities. They form new strategies and offer relevant tasks with an emphasis on the success and growth of employees.
The coaching style of leadership is advantageous for employers as well as employees, however, it is often considered the most underutilized style because it can be more time-intensive and demands more effort than other forms of leadership.
This is the style of leadership in which the leader himself becomes the benchmark to which the team members aspire to. Much like a pacesetter in a race, a very driven and energetic leader might become the standard of work which is to be expected. It is a very efficient method as it pumps up the employees to give their best.
However, it should be used sparingly as it might lead to team burnout. It is the perfect style of leadership for achieving short term goals but it should be avoided in the long run.
Like democratic leadership, this style of leadership is also the complete opposite of the autocratic style. While the autocratic style requires the leader to be firm as a rock, this style allows the members to have more freedom to go about doing a task in their own way.
Of all the leadership styles, this style requires the least amount of involvement and oversight from the leader himself.
Though the leader should maintain a balance, for this form is taken to extremes, it makes the leader look too aloof and uninvolved which might eventually reduce team morale.
This style of leadership shares many similarities with coaching style as it focuses on clear communication, employee motivation, and goal setting. However, instead of each employee’s individual goal, the majority of energy is invested to accomplish the organization’s objectives.
It is a popular form of leadership among growth-minded companies as it motivates employees and encourages them to reach their highest potential. The most significant drawback of this style of leadership is that transformational leaders are at risk of losing sight of employees’ growth for the success of the entire organization.
Under this type of leadership, managers tend to establish predetermined incentives in the form of monetary rewards for success and disciplinary actions for failure. Transactional leadership defines the roles and responsibilities of every employee with a focus on mentorship, instructions, and training of the entire team.
The most important disadvantage of this style of leadership is that it does not leave enough space for innovation and creativity in employees and follows a rigid structure that might not adapt well to change.
Depending on the nature and structure of the organization, leaders should choose a specific style of leadership with the utmost attention and care. In today’s world which is constantly changing, leaders and managers need to combine traditional practices of leadership with new approaches and innovation so that they can adapt to the present circumstances and lead the organization to the highest peak.
This programme seeks to work towards the mission of providing quality executive education and develop leadership potential. The course aims to develop strategic thinking and implementation skills and helps the participant in learning to appreciate of the concepts of corporate strategy.
The 12 month executive will be taught through live online classes and will consist of face-to-face workshops including case studies, content and business simulations at the IIM Calcutta Campus. participants will get to learn from renowned faculty from India and abroad during online interactive lectures. Special inputs from International Faculty and accredited International Institute will be given. Participants will be awarded with the recognized certification from IIMC which helps in improving the eligibility for better job profiles. The Executive Education Alumni membership of IIMC has its own sets of advantages for adding to identity, brand value, and marketability of the candidates.
Keep yourself updated.